[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --daemon vs. server-start
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: --daemon vs. server-start |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:44:16 -0800 (PST) |
Stephen Berman <address@hidden> writes:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:39:06 -0800 (PST) Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
wrote:
>
> > You seem to assume that "emacs" and "emacs --daemon" are doing the same
> > thing, they are not,
> > emacs --daemon
> > is similar to
> > emacs -nw -f server-start
>
> Thanks for the clarification. Obviously, I did not understand this from
> the documentation (Emacs manual, NEWS). Did I overlook it? If so,
> would you please give me a pointer, and if not, could this please be
> documented?
No idea if this is documented, and I personally think it's not worth
bothering, but probably the docs people would welcome patches.
> > so emacs --daemon it will ignore all the X11 related options.
>
> Is this fundamental to starting Emacs without an initial frame, or
> an artifact of the current implementation? In other words, could
> --daemon be implemented in a way that allows passing X11 options?
It probably could, no idea how hard it would be. Just needs someone
that cares about this to sit down and do it.
> One thing that
> makes me think this should be possible is the fact that I can "pass" X11
> options that are exposed to Lisp; e.g., when I invoke Emacs like this:
>
> emacs -Q --daemon --eval "(setq default-frame-alist '((font-backend .
\"xft\") (font . \"Dejavu Sans-10\")))"
This is not passing X11 options, this directly setting internal data
structures, you can do anything that way.
>
> and then invoke `emacsclient -c', the frame that appears has the font
> Dejavu Sans-10 with antialiasing. In contrast, as I observed in my OP,
> with this invocation:
>
> emacs -Q --daemon -xrm "Emacs.FontBackend: xft" -fn "Dejavu Sans-10"
>
> the frame that appears upon `emacsclient -c' has neither antialiasing
> nor this font. What I don't understand is why the former invocation
> "works" and the latter doesn't. (I accept that that's the way it is, I
> just don't see why.) I'd be interested in and grateful for an
> explanation.
Again, starting
emacs -Q --daemon
is similar to starting
emacs -Q -nw -f server-start
add your options at the end and compare the effect.
Re: --daemon vs. server-start, Giorgos Keramidas, 2009/01/25