[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pretest next week
From: |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu |
Subject: |
Re: Pretest next week |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:47:57 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:46:59 +0900, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden>
>>>>> said:
>>> How do you recognize the current status and perspective of the C-g
>>> issue in the Cocoa/GNUstep port? The changes made so far weren't
>>> "nontrivial", indeed. But I meant by "nontrivial" the still
>>> remaining "Feval call in menu bar activation". Actually, menu bar
>>> tracking itself is problematic inside read_socket_hook if the
>>> Cocoa/GNUstep port is trying to follow what the Carbon port does
>>> with respect to C-g.)
>> Work on this may still proceed during the pretest; we are not yet
>> in a hard code freeze. It is not serious enough to delay the start
>> of the pretest.
> Of course, it's up to you maintainers whether to start pretest at
> this stage. But I dare to say it's a serious issue from my
> experience.
If you want to start the pretest soon, I suggest putting off the
inclusion of the Cocoa/GNUstep port until Emacs 23.2 (or later). In
particular, the GNUstep port doesn't have enough quality to start
pretest.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
- Re: Pretest next week,
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <=
- Re: Pretest next week, Chong Yidong, 2009/02/01
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/01
- Re: Pretest next week, Richard M Stallman, 2009/02/02
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/02
- Re: Pretest next week, Richard M Stallman, 2009/02/04
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/04
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/02/04
Re: Pretest next week, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/02