[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??
From: |
Don Armstrong |
Subject: |
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail?? |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:34:19 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009, Jason Rumney wrote:
> For other sub-packages that come under the umbrella of the emacs
> developers, we have assigned bugs to "emacs,PACKAGE", so that the
> sub-package can be used as a filter in the web interface, but the
> emacs maintainers continue to be kept in the loop.
I think usertags and completely reassigning the bug to the other
package will serve you all better in the end, but that's your choice.
> People don't file bugs against those packages, since the only
> address for filing bugs is for emacs. But they might get reassigned
> later.
People can, actually. And file in this case also means reassign; you
get warned if you assign a bug to a package which does not exist.
Don Armstrong
--
More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads.
One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness.
The other, to total extinction.
Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly.
-- Woody Allen
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu