[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-n and C-a
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: C-n and C-a |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:54:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
>> I propose `C-x n v' (similar to the related key `C-x C-n' plus `v'
>> that stands for "visual") or `C-x l v' (with the mnemonics of
>> "line visual").
>
> 3. C-x n is the narrowing/widening prefix. This seems unrelated to narrowing.
>
> C-x n d narrow-to-defun
> C-x n n narrow-to-region
> C-x n p narrow-to-page
> C-x n w widen
> ... (future)
Can you invent more narrowing commands?
If not, then why not to use the same prefix
for commands that would have some mnemonics
associated with it?
> 4. C-x l is count-lines-page.
Do you often use count-lines-page?
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: C-n and C-a, Leo, 2009/02/01
- Re: C-n and C-a, Juri Linkov, 2009/02/01
- Re: C-n and C-a, Juri Linkov, 2009/02/01
- Re: C-n and C-a,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: C-n and C-a, Juri Linkov, 2009/02/06
- Re: C-n and C-a, Chong Yidong, 2009/02/06
- Re: C-n and C-a, Juri Linkov, 2009/02/07
- Re: C-n and C-a, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/08
- Re: C-n and C-a, Christian Schlauer, 2009/02/09
- RE: C-n and C-a, Drew Adams, 2009/02/09
- Re: C-n and C-a, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/09
- RE: C-n and C-a, Drew Adams, 2009/02/09