[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pretest next week
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Pretest next week |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:42:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
> Yes, signal() IS called with SIGIO, input_available_signal(), and the latter
> is never called (according to an fprintf which works fine running under X).
> I also tried calling signal() at various later times, in case the handler
> gets replaced.
What happens if you do a "kill -IO <...>" from the shell?
Is your fprintf properly executed? I.e. is it that the proicess doesn't
receive any IO signal or is it that those signals don't invoke your
signal handler? Also, could it be that the signals get delivered to
another thread?
Stefan
- Re: Pretest next week, (continued)
- Re: Pretest next week, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/02
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/02
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/02/04
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/04
- Re: Pretest next week, Richard M Stallman, 2009/02/05
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/05
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/02/05
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/06
Re: Pretest next week, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/02
Re: Pretest next week,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: Pretest next week, Kenichi Handa, 2009/02/03