[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode; also, mark-defun in c-mode
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode; also, mark-defun in c-mode |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:27:03 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi, Miles!
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:13:39PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Instead of moving to the end of the current function, it actually seems
> to move one line further if there's whitespace there. This is
> inconsistent with the behavior of end-of-defun elsewhere in emacs.
In
1
2
3 (defun foo ()
4 (bar))
5
6
, C-M-e moves point to BOL 5.
In
1
2
3 int foo ()
4 {
5 return bar () ;
6 }
7
8
, C-M-e moves pointo to BOL 7. Honest, I've just tried it, with CVS from
a few days ago, with -Q. That looks consistent to me. I must have
missed something, somewhere.
Could you put some elisp and C source up with a precise description of
how they're different, please.
> Also, since "mark-defun" basically does the right thing in c-mode
> (except for slightly funny handling of whitespace due to c-mode's wacky
> end-of-defun behavior), the current c-mode specific binding of C-M-h
> (c-mark-function) should probably be removed.
`c-mark-function' will mark a construct which lacks a brace block, such
as
int foo (int bar) ;
, whereas C-M-a and C-M-e search for outermost brace blocks ("soon" to be
enhanced to find objects inside C++ namespaces and the like).
I have no idea how useful this marking of a braceless construct is.
_Somebody_ probably uses it. (Hi, Barry Warsaw, are you listening?)
> Thanks,
> -Miles
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode; also, mark-defun in c-mode, Miles Bader, 2009/02/02
- Re: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode; also, mark-defun in c-mode,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode; also, mark-defun in c-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/02
- Re: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode; also, mark-defun in c-mode, Miles Bader, 2009/02/03
- Re: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode; also, mark-defun in c-mode, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/03
- Re: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode; also, mark-defun in c-mode, Miles Bader, 2009/02/03
- Re: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode; also, mark-defun in c-mode, Miles Bader, 2009/02/03
- Re: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode; also, mark-defun in c-mode, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/03
- Re: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode; also, mark-defun in c-mode, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/03
- end-of-defun is fubsr. [Was: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode], Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/03
- Re: end-of-defun is fubsr. [Was: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode], Juanma Barranquero, 2009/02/03
- Re: end-of-defun is fubsr. [Was: end-of-defun acts weirdly in c-mode], Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/03