[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr repository ready?
From: |
Karl Fogel |
Subject: |
Re: bzr repository ready? |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:28:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> Karl Fogel <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I'm puzzled because, as far as CVS is concerned, there really was a
>> change here: on the 'lexbind' branch, lisp/cua-start.el received a
>> change in revision 1.50.2.39, and that change was a result of
>> "Merge from emacs--devo--0".
>
> That's only because CVS has no way to represent merges. The real change
> happend on the master branch.
Okay, this puzzle has been solved: that change was a merge to the
'lexbind' branch, and indeed, I've found it in Bazaar in that branch.
Sorry for the noise.
Continuing my conversion spot-check, I've uploaded the results so far:
http://www.red-bean.com/kfogel/emacs-bzr-switchover/sanity-checks.txt
(76 KB, a bit large for the mailing list maybe.)
Results so far: individual changes seem okay, but there are some
problems with branches and tags.
It looks like not all CVS tags are present. Some of those might be
branch-point tags (and thus unnecessary in git or bzr)... but how the
conversion would recognize them as such I don't know. And it's a lot of
tags missing: like, 224 of them.
As for branches: all the CVS branches appear to be present in Bazaar,
but there are still a few questions.
Jason, Andreas, and anyone else, if you could take a look in that file
and offer your thoughts, I'd appreciate it. The strings to search for
are:
"Spot-check a branch-sync change."
"Check that all tags are present."
"Check that all branches are present."
-Karl
- Re: bzr repository ready?,
Karl Fogel <=