[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009 |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:15:14 +0900 |
In article <address@hidden>, Adrian Robert <address@hidden> writes:
> I meant my question more from a user perspective. If they call 'set-
> frame-font or similar, do ALL of the fonts, on, e.g., the HELLO
> screen, get switched to be the most similar to the user's selection
> with the appropriate charset, or does it just change the ASCII font?
Yes, at least that is the intention.
> Experimenting with the non-freetype X build here, just set-frame-font
> doesn't seem to do it, but selecting something from the shift-left-
> mouse menu does (but I can't fully trace out what is getting called
> in this case).
Then, it seems that there's a bug somewhere. I'll work on it.
>>> Also, is there a plan to update the documentation for match() and
>>> list
>>> () in font.h? I'm willing to do this (after I've finished and tested
>>> my new implementation) if no one else has time.
> >
> > I don't know what else should be added to the
> > documentations, but if you think the current ones must be
> > improved, please go ahead.
> The full list of properties that can appear bundled under the
> FONT_EXTRA property that are important for drivers to take into
> account in match() and list() should be specified somewhere in font.h.
Ah, I see what you mean.
> In font.c there is font_property_table, which lists everything that
> is a "first class" property in font.h (explicitly listed in
> font_property_index), plus the following: 'lang', 'script', and
> 'otf'. While the font-spec function mentions 'script' and 'name',
> but not 'lang' or 'otf'. I'm not sure about the criterion for
> putting something under "EXTRA" or listing it in one place or another
> in font.c, but if the font driver should respond to it, especially
> for something as important as core emacs font selection, it should be
> mentioned in font.h.
Ok, I'll document them.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, (continued)
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Jason Rumney, 2009/02/10
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Kenichi Handa, 2009/02/12
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/12
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Kenichi Handa, 2009/02/12
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Adrian Robert, 2009/02/12
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Kenichi Handa, 2009/02/14
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Adrian Robert, 2009/02/15
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Kenichi Handa, 2009/02/15
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Kenichi Handa, 2009/02/15
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Adrian Robert, 2009/02/17
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Kenichi Handa, 2009/02/17
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/17
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Kenichi Handa, 2009/02/17
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/18
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Adrian Robert, 2009/02/19
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Kenichi Handa, 2009/02/23
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/15
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Adrian Robert, 2009/02/17
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/02/17
- Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009, Adrian Robert, 2009/02/19