[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32
From: |
David Robinow |
Subject: |
Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32 |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:32:57 -0500 |
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 22:34, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> That probably means your `strip' command is incompatible with the
>> development tools used to build emacs.exe. Is `strip' a Cygwin port,
>> by chance? You need `strip.exe' from the MinGW Binutils, not from
>> Cygwin.
>
> Whenever I've tried to strip the Emacs executable, I've got an invalid
> emacs.exe.
>
> That, using a MinGW strip.exe on a MinGW-compiled Emacs.
I thought 'strip' had worked at some time in the past, but I'm getting
the same result.
Not that I actually care. I normally use "configure --no-debug"
- emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Leo, 2009/02/27
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/27
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/27
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/02/27
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32,
David Robinow <=
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Jason Rumney, 2009/02/28
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/28
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Jason Rumney, 2009/02/27
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/02/27
- Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/28
Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Lennart Borgman, 2009/02/27
Re: emacs.exe is > 32M for w32, Chetan Pandya, 2009/02/27