[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Commiting gdb-mi.el changes to Emacs upstream
From: |
Dmitry Dzhus |
Subject: |
Commiting gdb-mi.el changes to Emacs upstream |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:42:03 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
I'm now ready to push some of the changes I made to gdb-mi.el to Emacs
trunk. I personally use hg and now I'm thinking what's the best way to
put all the changes in Emacs CVS.
I did more than 60 commits to my repo since it was last «synced» (that
was done by Nick for me) with Emacs CVS.
On one hand, I don't want to upload all changes in one huge CVS commit
because it will be painful to track changes introduced:
gdb-mi.el | 1426 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
On the other hand, I'm not sure if it's a good idea to spam Emacs CVS
with 60 commits.
Should I split the big patch into several (not dozens) more or less
self-contained patches?
Please tell me what's the preferred way to do it. If 60 commits are ok
i'll write a script which will push my mercurial commits to emacs cvs
commits (as long as it's possible). This way granularity I have in my
local repo will be preserved in Emacs upstream as well.
--
Happy Hacking.
http://sphinx.net.ru
む
- Commiting gdb-mi.el changes to Emacs upstream,
Dmitry Dzhus <=