emacs-devel
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
From
:
Richard Stallman
Subject
:
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
Date
:
Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:05:15 -0400
If people want kill-buffer to warn in some additional cases, I won't argue against it.
reply via email to
[
Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
(continued)
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Drew Adams
,
2009/07/05
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Bob Rogers
,
2009/07/05
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Drew Adams
,
2009/07/05
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Johan Bockgård
,
2009/07/07
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Richard Stallman
,
2009/07/05
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Drew Adams
,
2009/07/05
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Richard Stallman
,
2009/07/04
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Drew Adams
,
2009/07/05
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Richard Stallman
,
2009/07/06
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Drew Adams
,
2009/07/06
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Richard Stallman
<=
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Robert J. Chassell
,
2009/07/06
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Juri Linkov
,
2009/07/06
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Drew Adams
,
2009/07/06
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Juri Linkov
,
2009/07/07
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Juri Linkov
,
2009/07/08
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Drew Adams
,
2009/07/09
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Juri Linkov
,
2009/07/09
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Drew Adams
,
2009/07/09
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Juri Linkov
,
2009/07/09
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
,
Drew Adams
,
2009/07/09
Prev by Date:
Re: & and M-& to run programs asynchronously
Next by Date:
Re: Sending attachments
Previous by thread:
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
Next by thread:
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
Index(es):
Date
Thread