[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sending attachments
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Sending attachments |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:29:45 -0400 |
> In theory, that kind of recommendation might be useful.
> But in practice, since the readers decide heuristically
True, but shouldn't we focus on users of smarter readers, and on our
own use cases?
The readers that decide heuristically are the smarter readers, at
least in my opinion. I would not want to use one that always obeys
the specified disposition.
That may be true in many users' practice. However, I find myself
offering a recommendation about 10-20% of the time, because I disagree
with the default.
I am not opposed to having a more complex interface like the current one
of mml-attach-file. I just want a simpler one to be the usual one.
Using C-u to make it ask the other questions seems fine.
- Re: Sending attachments, (continued)
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/09
- Re: Sending attachments, Reiner Steib, 2009/07/09
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/10
- Re: Sending attachments, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/10
- Re: Sending attachments, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/10
- Re: Sending attachments, Jason Rumney, 2009/07/10
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/11
- Re: Sending attachments, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/10
- Re: Sending attachments,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Sending attachments, Jason Rumney, 2009/07/10
- Re: Sending attachments, Reiner Steib, 2009/07/08
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/09
- Re: Sending attachments, Reiner Steib, 2009/07/09
- Re: Sending attachments, Reiner Steib, 2009/07/08
- Re: Sending attachments, Jason Rumney, 2009/07/07
- Re: Sending attachments, Glenn Morris, 2009/07/06
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/07
- Re: Sending attachments, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/03
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/03