[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Infrastructural complexity.
From: |
joakim |
Subject: |
Re: Infrastructural complexity. |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 02:29:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
>> To me, Emacs frames are an existing abstraction that is already very
>> close to how each individual panel, tearoff, and pop-up works... One
>> example is if you look at Eclipse screen shots and the panel down the
>> left side - sometimes it is split vertically; sometimes the user gets
>> to add additional vertical splits. That panel is, to my mind, a frame
>> -- just with this slight "subordination" addition and perhaps a
>> restriction about which buffers can be displayed there.
>
> The proofs of concept written by Joakim and Martin already handle this
> behavior. They don't require much of a change to the usual window
> semantics, either; the only new rule is that window operations only
> effect the windows within the current window group (e.g., C-x 1 would
> not delete the windows in other groups).
>
> The only thing new that the "framelets" idea brings to the table is the
> possibility of a separate set of tool-bars. But I don't think it's a
> big advantage considering (i) the extra engineering that would be
> required to get these extra toolbars to work, and (ii) the fact that
> Emacs is mostly keyboard-driven anyway.
More toolbars within Emacs windows would be doable with my xwidget
patch. But I agree keyboard-driven is the true Emacs flavour.
--
Joakim Verona
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., (continued)
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Chong Yidong, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Chong Yidong, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity.,
joakim <=
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Miles Bader, 2009/07/20
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/20
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Leo, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Juri Linkov, 2009/07/18
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Leo, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Miles Bader, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/19