[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: message-mode is now default?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: message-mode is now default? |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 06:52:28 -0400 |
Bringing message-mode in line with mail-mode makes only sense where
message-mode is clearly inferior.
You may consider message-mode inferior, someone else like myself might
not.
message-mode should atleast follow the standard conventions for
hooking in different methods for sending mail, it doesn't. That way,
it will work for those who prefer mail-mode, and those who prefer
message-mode. Otherwise, it will break things as I reported before.
- Re: message-mode is now default?, (continued)
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Miles Bader, 2009/07/19
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/19
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/20
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Reiner Steib, 2009/07/20
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/19
- Re: message-mode is now default?, David Kastrup, 2009/07/19
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Bastien, 2009/07/19
- Re: message-mode is now default?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Differences between mail-mode and message-mode - sending mail (was: message-mode is now default?), Reiner Steib, 2009/07/19