[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch? |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:22:24 -0400 |
Richard, is it OK with you to keep the following features only for a
proprietary platform (Cocoa) in the Emacs 23.1 release?
> 1. Code for stippling. This is wrongly implemented as tiling, which
> has been controversial whether or not to be included in the other
> platforms, IIUC.
An incorrect implementation of stippling is somewhat of a bug,
but it might be better than no implementation of stippling.
Anyway, I don't see a reason to object that this is only on MacOS.
> 2. Code for interpreting incompatible color formats: RGBrrggbb,
> ARGBaarrggbb, HSVhhssvv, AHSVaahhssvv, and CMYKccmmyykk. Besides
> the format itself, support for the alpha-component in color is
> not found in the other platforms but not inherently NS-specific.
These are minor things, nothing to object to.
> 3. Lisp primitive ns-set-alpha (nsfns.m), which sets the alpha
> component of the given color to the specified value. As in the
> argument for the alpha-component above, this is not inherently
> NS-specific.
> 4. Lisp function ns-set-background-alpha (ns-win.el), which sets
> alpha-component of frame background color. It is different from
> the frame parameter `alpha' as Adrian explained. Again, this is
> not inherently NS-specific.
These too are rather minor, nothing to object to.
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, (continued)
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Jason Rumney, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/24
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/24
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Miles Bader, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/26
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/26
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/27
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Clifford Wulfman, 2009/07/27
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/28
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Clifford Wulfman, 2009/07/28
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/28