[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?
From: |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu |
Subject: |
Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:22:43 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:09:20 -0400, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> said:
> I know, but I think such changes so late in the pretest aren't a
> good idea. Only critical bugs deserve to be fixed now.
I think infringement of GNU policy (in particular, about adding a
general feature to a non-free platform first) is so critical for Emacs
that it should be considered a critical bug that deserves to be fixed
now.
What do maintainers think?
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, (continued)
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2009/07/27
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/28
- Message not available
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2009/07/28
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/27
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/28
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/24
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?,
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <=
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/28
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/28
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/29
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/28
Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Adrian Robert, 2009/07/24
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/24
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Adrian Robert, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/26
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Adrian Robert, 2009/07/26