[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New sync'd branch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: New sync'd branch |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:04:41 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> - Changes on the 23 branch need to be sync'd to the trunk. As long as
>> we haven't switched to Bzr, that means we need Miles to do the sync
>> for us. Miles, could you do that?
>> refers to. Miles? What's your verdict?
> Uh, I guess so... well, I'm willing to try, anyway.
You don't seem too enthusiastic. Maybe another option would be to
make the Emacs-24 branch not in CVS but directly in Git (from where it
will be eventually turned into a Bzr branch).
- this way, syncing from the Emacs-23 branch (i.e. the CVS trunk) should
be easy and can be done by anyone at any time: Miles is off the hook.
- the conversion to Bzr won't be affected (and the history and merging
will be preserved).
- the Emacs-23 branch will still be the Emacs trunk, so it will
hopefully still see a lot of testing.
- the downside of course is that people who want to work on or play with
the Emacs-24 branch will need to learn to use Git.
How does that sound?
Stefan
- New sync'd branch, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/23
- Re: New sync'd branch, joakim, 2009/08/23
- Re: New sync'd branch, Dmitry Dzhus, 2009/08/24
- Re: New sync'd branch, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/25
- Re: New sync'd branch, Miles Bader, 2009/08/26
- Re: New sync'd branch,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: New sync'd branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/26
- Re: New sync'd branch, Miles Bader, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Teemu Likonen, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/28
- Re: New sync'd branch, Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Teemu Likonen, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Christian Faulhammer, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Miles Bader, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/08/27