[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rename-file
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: rename-file |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:20:34 +0200 |
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Stefan Monnier<address@hidden> wrote:
>> Why isn't the buffer, which is visiting a file, renamed
>> when I rename the underlying file with rename-file?
>
> Because rename-file is a low-level function. Maybe we should introduce
> a new command rename-file-buffer which automatically applies to the
> current buffer's file.
Yes, that would be good because it would be less confusing.
- Re: rename-file, (continued)
- Re: rename-file, Stephen Berman, 2009/08/27
- Re: rename-file, Andreas Schwab, 2009/08/27
- Re: rename-file, Stephen Berman, 2009/08/27
- Re: rename-file, Andreas Schwab, 2009/08/27
- Re: rename-file, Stephen Berman, 2009/08/27
- Re: rename-file, Miles Bader, 2009/08/27
- Re: rename-file, Stephen Berman, 2009/08/27
- Re: rename-file, Andreas Schwab, 2009/08/27
- Re: rename-file, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/27
Re: rename-file, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/26
- Re: rename-file,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: rename-file, Sam Steingold, 2009/08/26
- Re: rename-file, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/26
- Re: rename-file, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/26
- Re: rename-file, Sam Steingold, 2009/08/26
- Re: rename-file, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/27
- Re: rename-file, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/28
- Re: rename-file, Sam Steingold, 2009/08/31
Re: rename-file, Sam Steingold, 2009/08/27
Re: rename-file, martin rudalics, 2009/08/26
Re: rename-file, Daniel Colascione, 2009/08/27