[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:20:30 -0400 |
The best way to make such a distinction clearly visible is by providing
an argument. Even better would be to make the argument mandatory.
A mandatory argument would make people think, each time, about which
question they want to ask. That would be good. But it would require
changing every existing call to either of these functions. That's
a rather high price.
- Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/01
- Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/01
- Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/03
- Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/09/03
- Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/03
- Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/09/03
- Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/04
- Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p, Glenn Morris, 2009/09/03
- Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/09/04