[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CEDET merge question
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: CEDET merge question |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:33:28 -0400 |
CEDET uses Bison grammars which are extended through "Optional Lambda
Expressions" (OLE). They produce the actual tags, which are the basic
objects resulting from the parsing stage. I don't think this can be
easily replaced by Bison itself or Guile.
Why is it hard to add these to Bison?
It can handle embedded C code, so why not embedded Lisp code?
It should be straightforward to make such changes.
- CEDET merge question, Chong Yidong, 2009/09/05
- Re: CEDET merge question, David Engster, 2009/09/05
- Re: CEDET merge question, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/06
- Re: CEDET merge question, Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/06
- Re: CEDET merge question, David Engster, 2009/09/06
- Re: CEDET merge question, Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/06
- Re: CEDET merge question,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: CEDET merge question, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/09/12
- Re: CEDET merge question, Miles Bader, 2009/09/12
- Re: CEDET merge question, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/13
- Re: CEDET merge question, tomas, 2009/09/14
- Re: CEDET merge question, Miles Bader, 2009/09/14
- Re: CEDET merge question, tomas, 2009/09/14
- Re: CEDET merge question, David Engster, 2009/09/12
- Re: CEDET merge question, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/13
- Re: CEDET merge question, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/09/13
- Re: CEDET merge question, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/14