[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist? |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:01:39 -0700 |
> > > I think I posted this in response to a request on
> > > gnu.emacs.help, back around 2008-11-18, but I can't
> > > find it via Google:
> >
> > Yes, you did - I see it now. You posted it on 2009-11-18,
> > with Subject "emacs mode line suggestions".
>
> Do you mean "You will post it on 2009-11-18"?
No, sorry. I meant to say that Kevin was right that he posted it to
help-gnu-emacs on 2008-11-18. I just wanted to add the Subject line. But I
messed up the date.
- new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Drew Adams, 2009/09/22
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Deniz Dogan, 2009/09/22
- RE: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Drew Adams, 2009/09/22
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Kevin Rodgers, 2009/09/23
- RE: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Drew Adams, 2009/09/23
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Juri Linkov, 2009/09/24
- RE: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/24
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Juri Linkov, 2009/09/25
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/25
- Re: new buffer - should its mode reflect its name when the name matches auto-mode-alist?, Juri Linkov, 2009/09/29