[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 May 2010 21:01:17 +0300 |
> From: Ken Raeburn <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 13:12:29 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> If you need to pick one place, then I think for now emacs.c is the right
> place.
Until someone moves it again, that is...
Why was it moved, anyway? I don't remember any discussions of that,
apologies if I missed something. The string was in version.el since
forever. The move subtly broke the MS-DOS port, btw, which I could
have prevented if I just knew about it coming, which I didn't until
now.
<Shrug> I guess it's a lost battle, anyway.
- Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Jeff Kowalczyk, 2010/05/20
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Ken Raeburn, 2010/05/20
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Ken Raeburn, 2010/05/20
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/05/21
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/21
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/05/21
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/21
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Ken Raeburn, 2010/05/21
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/22
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/05/22
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Richard Stallman, 2010/05/22
- Re: Canonical location for emacs-version string in source tree?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/23