[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
split up process.c [was: Re: Changes in process.c]
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
split up process.c [was: Re: Changes in process.c] |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:52:39 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> People who make changes in process.c related to keyboard input and
> wait_reading_process_output, please remember that there are two
> branches in process.c, one for systems that support async
> subprocesses, the other for those which don't (only MS-DOS in the
> latter class). Making changes only in one of them is going to break
> something.
This points to the ugliness of the situation.
Why don't we split the part for supporting MS-DOS into a different
file: process-no-subprocesses.c (or some better name)
That makes the file easier to read, less clunky, and problems easier
to catch with a simple grep.
- Changes in process.c, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/08
- split up process.c [was: Re: Changes in process.c],
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: split up process.c [was: Re: Changes in process.c], Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/08
- Re: split up process.c [was: Re: Changes in process.c], Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/10
- Re: split up process.c, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/07/10
- Re: split up process.c, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/11
- Re: split up process.c, Chong Yidong, 2010/07/11