[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:34:29 +0900 |
Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
> I possible solution for this problem is to use `actions'. An action is a
> generic concept like `fordward-line', or `undo', or `save', or `yank'
> (`paste', if you prefer.) `universal-argument',
> `execute-extended-command' and `C-x' (whatever is officially called on
> Emacs jargon) would be actions as well.
That works for very common commands and simple bindings, but does
nothing to handle the vast number of very specialized bindings.
The basic problem is that Emacs is not an app with a simple central list
of bindings, it's a bunch of cooperating parts, and there are _many_
unstated but significant relationships between these parts.
-Miles
--
Liberty, n. One of imagination's most precious possessions.
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, (continued)
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Uday S Reddy, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Jeff Clough, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Phil Hagelberg, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Fernando C.V., 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Christoph, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Miles Bader, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/07/18
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Deniz Dogan, 2010/07/18
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Geoff Gole, 2010/07/18
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/07/18
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Geoff Gole, 2010/07/19