[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:34:56 +0900 |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
>> Some of the differences are fairly easy to fix -- e.g., list-buffers
>> uses whizzy new-style header-line headers, whereas ibuffer uses
>> oldskool simple fixed-width headers.
>
> Ibuffer already uses the header line to show filtering status.
That is not sacred.
[Nor is list-buffer's use for the header, of course -- sometimes I think
that using the header-line for table headers like that is _bad_, because
it can obscure the fact that the buffer is scrolled (I occasionally find
myself confused because of such usage). Perhaps a better solution would
be to simply apply the nice face stylings to ibuffer's header, but keep
it in the buffer.]
-miles
--
Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without
individual responsibility.
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, (continued)
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Chong Yidong, 2010/10/09
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/10/09
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/10/09
- RE: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Drew Adams, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Miles Bader, 2010/10/07
- RE: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Drew Adams, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Chong Yidong, 2010/10/09
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Juri Linkov, 2010/10/07
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Deniz Dogan, 2010/10/08