[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New function: vc-ediff
From: |
Uday S Reddy |
Subject: |
Re: New function: vc-ediff |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:46:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
On 3/11/2011 4:12 AM, Michael Welsh Duggan wrote:
Is this different from `ediff-revision'?
`ediff-revision' asks just a few too many questions. Most of the time,
you just want to compare the current buffer with the latest revision.
So, I find myself having to hit a lot of RETs when I use `ediff-revision'.
ediff's defaults in terms of ediff-last-use-dir are also not right in
the context of vc. I was burned by them on a few occasions. You think
you are comparing the current buffer with its revision, but ediff would
have gone and picked up a file with the same name in the last-use-dir
and started comparing it with its revision. If you maintain multiple
development lines, this might happen more often than one might expect,
and the results can be quite confusing and even dangerous.
The user interface turns out to be just a bit too important in this case.
Cheers,
Uday
- Re: New function: vc-ediff, (continued)
- Re: New function: vc-ediff, Uday S Reddy, 2011/03/13
- Re: New function: vc-ediff, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/13
- Re: New function: vc-ediff, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/13
- Re: New function: vc-ediff, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/13
- Re: New function: vc-ediff, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/12
- Re: New function: vc-ediff, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/12
Re: New function: vc-ediff, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2011/03/10