[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (patch) sort cycling completion candidates
|
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
|
Subject: |
Re: (patch) sort cycling completion candidates |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 04:26:26 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:59:15 -0400 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I am in favor of Antoine's patch: it fixes a bug and is cleaner, but I'm
>> citing both for completeness.
SM> Taking a closer look at those patches, I now wonder: should it take
SM> precedence over the "recently used" preference, as Antoine's does,
SM> or not? I'd tend to think it should not, as in the patch below.
I think either order is OK so whatever you think is right...
Ted