Re: deferred-action

[Stefan Monnier]

> I understand that. And no, I don't think it's enough, because each
> piece of code using them is quite  free to do it as it pleases (some
> could use deferred-action-list as a flag, other as a list of items to
> treat, a third as a list of functions to run, etc.), but on the other
> hand, deferred-action-function is intended to contain just a function,
> so there's nowhere explained HOW would several packages coordinate
> their different uses.

That's because that would require a coding convention for its use, and
nobody came up with such a thing.


        Stefan