[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:20:37 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
SM> I know, but I don't think there's any fundamental good reason why we
SM> can't tweak emacs/lisp/Makefile.in so that it gets things to work.
> They are packages, that's a great reason :) Yeah, you can do it, but
> it's going to break sooner or later. I like Chong's approach better
> than tweaking things.
> Also, isn't it better to put the rules inside the GNU ELPA (thus the
> "elpa" branch) than inside Emacs' lisp/Makefile.in, as Chong suggested?
Where they go doesn't matter much, yes.. The important part is to be
able to use them in-place and have them all activated from a single
place with "bzr up; make".
Stefan
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, (continued)
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Reiner Steib, 2011/03/25
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/25
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/25
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/25
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/28
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/29
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/29
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/30
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/30