[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:25:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
> That would be good, I think. Or else list them separately, with their own
> header, at the end of the buffer (so they don't get in the way).
The display in C-x b is a separate issue.
> Likewise, C-x 8 bindings?
Not sure what "likewise" means here: C-x 8 bindings don't suffer
from this "only enabled after you load iso-transl.el", and should never
conflict with anything else, so there's no reason to change this part.
Stefan
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, (continued)
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Tim Cross, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Tim Cross, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/26
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/26