[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC |
Date: |
Sun, 06 May 2012 01:43:13 +0900 |
Yann Hodique writes:
> Although the comparison with HTML is probably not that fair,
No, and I would think Drew in particular would avoid comparing a
properly standardized vulgarity to a complete atrocity. But them's
the breaks.
> I do agree that it's bad email practice. More importantly, I'm
> wondering how it would not be better to leverage the existing
> RFC1341 that any decent mailer should implement.
Good idea, but poor implementation. IMSEO this:
>
binFXdG6gP9od.bin
Description: application/emacs-lisp
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, (continued)
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Antoine Levitt, 2012/05/05
- RE: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Drew Adams, 2012/05/05
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Peter Münster, 2012/05/05
- RE: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Drew Adams, 2012/05/05
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, John Wiegley, 2012/05/06
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/05/06
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Miles Bader, 2012/05/07
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/05/07
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/05/06
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Yann Hodique, 2012/05/05
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Yann Hodique, 2012/05/05
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Julien Danjou, 2012/05/07
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Yann Hodique, 2012/05/07
- RE: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Drew Adams, 2012/05/05
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Martyn Jago, 2012/05/05
- RE: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Drew Adams, 2012/05/05
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/05/07
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2012/05/07
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/05/08
- Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC, Bastien, 2012/05/08