RE: question about `sit-for' and `C-g'

[Drew Adams]

It seems that all I had to do was define a substitute for `sit-for' that does
exactly the same thing but also binds `inhibit-quit' to t around the call to
`read-event'.

I'm still interested in the questions I posed and learning more about this.

My next question is whether `sit-for' itself should do the same thing: bind
`inhibit-quit' to t.