[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Sep 2012 19:56:24 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Stephen Berman <address@hidden> writes:
> make VC also get the quicker bzr -r-1 results?
-r-1 and -l1 are quite different. The first only looks at the last
commit (so you get no output for files not modified there), whereas the
latter always outputs one commit (if the file is tracked at all).
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Stephen Berman, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Andreas Schwab, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Stephen Berman, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Stephen Berman, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Stephen Berman, 2012/09/15
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/15
Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/15