[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Rename `eww' to `web'
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Rename `eww' to `web' |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jul 2013 17:24:03 -0700 (PDT) |
> make it easier for the user by calling it someting obvious rather
> than the more cryptic. Using 'eww' may be considered 'cute', but
> it certainly isn't 'natural'.
> ...
> Using names which are as 'natural' and reflect purpose as much
> as possible will help and certainly won't make things worse.
+1. There is really little excuse for such names as Emacs commands.
A command name should preferably be something that `apropos' can
help with. In general it should have components that are
recognizable keywords.
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Ted Zlatanov, 2013/07/01
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Miles Bader, 2013/07/03
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Ted Zlatanov, 2013/07/03
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Glenn Morris, 2013/07/03
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Ted Zlatanov, 2013/07/03
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Tim Cross, 2013/07/03
- RE: Rename `eww' to `web',
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Ted Zlatanov, 2013/07/03
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', chad, 2013/07/03
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/07/04
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Ted Zlatanov, 2013/07/04
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Richard Stallman, 2013/07/04
- RE: Rename `eww' to `web', Drew Adams, 2013/07/03
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Richard Stallman, 2013/07/04
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Jambunathan K, 2013/07/04
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Richard Stallman, 2013/07/04
- Re: Rename `eww' to `web', Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/07/04