[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:30:31 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:50:42 -0500
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > If you want to support things like completions, refactoring, symbol
> > searches, etc., we need full access to the AST from inside Emacs.
>
> With all due respect, it is so important to avoid the full AST
> that I'm not going to give up on it just because someone claims
> that is necessary.
What would you need to know or hear to make up your mind on this
issue? IOW, what information is missing for you to agree or disagree
with David on this?
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/02
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Engster, 2015/01/02
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/03
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Engster, 2015/01/03
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/05
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/06
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Perry E. Metzger, 2015/01/06
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/06
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Perry E. Metzger, 2015/01/06
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/06
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/07
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/07
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Kastrup, 2015/01/07
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/07
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/01/07