[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:54:51 +0200 |
When people make infrastructure and low-level changes all over the
source tree, I'd appreciate if they either include the MS-Windows
specific parts in the scope of the changes, or at least tell here
explicitly that this-and-that parts were omitted for such-and-such
reasons. Several changes installed lately did neither, which leaves
those left-out places to be discovered either by chance or by bug
reports. That mode of operation makes very little sense to me.
Thanks in advance.
- Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes, Paul Eggert, 2015/01/16
- Re: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/17
- Re: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes, Paul Eggert, 2015/01/18
- Re: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/18
- Re: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes, Paul Eggert, 2015/01/18
- Re: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/18
- Re: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes, Paul Eggert, 2015/01/18
- Re: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/19
- Re: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes, Paul Eggert, 2015/01/19
- Re: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/19