[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function liter
|
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:57:50 -0200 |
On second thought. Because it's a reader macro, it would have to be
subr, since subr-x isn't necessarily loaded.
2015-01-21 22:54 GMT-02:00 Artur Malabarba <address@hidden>:
>> Also, I wouldn't know exactly where to put the Elisp
>> part, that's why it's still on github.
>
> I'd say subr.el, as that's where lambda is defined. Since the macro
> isn't “commonly used” yet, some might prefer for it to go into
> subr-x.el.
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/21
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, René Kyllingstad, 2015/01/22