[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function liter
From: |
Oleh |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:45:12 +0100 |
>> I've grepped the useage of `--map' in all > 150 third party packages
>> that depend on `dash'.
>> I got 203 total results 60 different packages. This says a lot about
>> people wanting this feature for a long time.
>
> No it doesn't: you didn't provide a baseline. Allow me.
>
> ~/edev/trunk/lisp
> $ ppgrep -w '(lambda' | wc -l
> 6834
Now, you're bending it the other way:)
Do note, that we're comparing `lambda', which was part of core Emacs
forever and ships with each Emacs,
to a library concieved 2 years ago, and to use which, the other
package writers have
to go out of their way (I, for one, try not to depend on third party
packages unless I have to).
So yes, it's 6834 vs 200, but consider the circumstances.
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, (continued)
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, René Kyllingstad, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal,
Oleh <=
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Ivan Andrus, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Leo Liu, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/01/24
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22