|
From: | Artur Malabarba |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal |
Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:48:59 -0200 |
> The proposed "short-lambda" is pure sugar and adds zero expressiveness > to the language. Furthermore, in Emacsen it would be subject to > substantial abuse (eg, in hooks where anonymous functions are a bad > idea). Are they more subject than a full lambda?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |