[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Minor feature idea
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Minor feature idea |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:56:58 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
On 01/22/2015 02:09 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> In the minibuffer reading a file name, C-a typed within the last
> component could move to the start of that component. The next time,
> it could move to the beginning of the line.
>
> If people think it is a good idea, I will write it if no one else
> does.
I use C-a C-k too often to want to change the C-a binding. The existing
movement function bindings are adequate if we want to use them.
>
> Alternatively, C-M-b and C-M-f could move by filename component.
> That is cleaner and does more, but those chars are harder to type
> and users won't come across it in their editing.
backward-sexp and forward-sexp feel like a better fit for navigation by
path component. They're close enough already that I frequently use them
to edit paths.
Another option is to repurpose the word movement bindings. I don't know
what to think of that. Is a filename a "word"?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Minor feature idea, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/22
- RE: Minor feature idea, Drew Adams, 2015/01/22
- Re: Minor feature idea,
Daniel Colascione <=
- RE: Minor feature idea, Drew Adams, 2015/01/22
- Re: Minor feature idea, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/22
- Re: Minor feature idea, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/22
- Re: Minor feature idea, Karl Fogel, 2015/01/23
- Re: Minor feature idea, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2015/01/23
- Re: Minor feature idea, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/01/22