[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master 7f4f16b: Merge branch 'master' of git.sv.gnu.org:/srv/git/ema
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: master 7f4f16b: Merge branch 'master' of git.sv.gnu.org:/srv/git/emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:39:52 +0200 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:46:36 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> >> address@hidden
> >> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:45:59 +0100
> >>
> >> > Why not "git show"?
> >>
> >> Because that doesn't tell you what will be pushed.
> >
> > I think it does, if I'm careful to push each commit.
>
> Why taking chances when it's easy to avoid?
OK, but is "push -n" really the best alternative? How about
"git diff origin/master" (resp. origin/emacs-24)?
- git push precautions, (continued)
- git push precautions, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/01/28
- Re: git push precautions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/28
- Re: git push precautions, David Kastrup, 2015/01/28
- Re: git push precautions, Kelvin White, 2015/01/28
- Re: git push precautions, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/01/28
- Re: git push precautions, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/28
- Re: git push precautions, David Kastrup, 2015/01/28
- Re: git push precautions, Yuri Khan, 2015/01/29
- Re: master 7f4f16b: Merge branch 'master' of git.sv.gnu.org:/srv/git/emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/28
- Re: master 7f4f16b: Merge branch 'master' of git.sv.gnu.org:/srv/git/emacs, Andreas Schwab, 2015/01/28
- Re: master 7f4f16b: Merge branch 'master' of git.sv.gnu.org:/srv/git/emacs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- git push precautions, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/01/28
- Re: master 7f4f16b: Merge branch 'master' of git.sv.gnu.org:/srv/git/emacs, Andreas Schwab, 2015/01/29
- Re: master 7f4f16b: Merge branch 'master' of git.sv.gnu.org:/srv/git/emacs, Nicolas Richard, 2015/01/29