[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Single quotes in Info
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Single quotes in Info |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:24:52 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:05:38 -0800 (PST)
> From: Drew Adams <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> I would like to see the ability for users to define classes, and to
> "activate" (enable the use of; turn on) or "deactivate" (turn off) a
> particular class of equivalences as a whole, including any of the
> predefined classes.
This would require modifying the Unicode tables. They are just large
char-tables, so someone who knows what they are doing should be able
to do that.
But that's not for the faint at heart, and I don't see why users would
like to disable or replace portions of those tables. I do understand
why in some use cases certain equivalences classes are inappropriate,
but they are inappropriate _as_a_whole_. Doing that for a part of a
class doesn't make sense to me. E.g., why would you want to make 2
and ② equivalent, but not 2 and ²? So this kind of customization
doesn't have to be easy, IMO, and it's okay to ask such users to know
what they are doing.
- Re: Single quotes in Info, (continued)
- Re: Single quotes in Info, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/28
- Re: Single quotes in Info, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/28
- RE: Single quotes in Info, Drew Adams, 2015/01/29
- Re: Single quotes in Info, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/29
- RE: Single quotes in Info, Drew Adams, 2015/01/29
- Re: Single quotes in Info, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/29
- RE: Single quotes in Info, Drew Adams, 2015/01/29
- Re: Single quotes in Info,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: Single quotes in Info, Drew Adams, 2015/01/29
- Re: Single quotes in Info, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/01/29
- RE: Single quotes in Info, Drew Adams, 2015/01/29