[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?
From: |
Oleh Krehel |
Subject: |
Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful? |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:00:37 +0100 |
Hi Nicolas,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Nicolas Petton <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sure, `seq-range' would be a convenient way to create a sequence of
> numbers. A simple implementation could be:
>
> (defun seq-range (start end)
> (let ((lst nil))
> (while (< start end)
> (push end lst)
> (setq end (1- end)))
> lst))
This is just `number-sequence' from subr.el.
Oleh
- Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/01/29
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/29
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/29
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/01/29
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/30
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?,
Oleh Krehel <=
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/01/30
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Oleh Krehel, 2015/01/30
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Nicolas Richard, 2015/01/30
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Oleh Krehel, 2015/01/30
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Oleh Krehel, 2015/01/30
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Nicolas Richard, 2015/01/30
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Oleh Krehel, 2015/01/30
- Re: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/01/30
What about seq-slice? (Was: Would seq-range and seq-mapcat be useful?), Mark Oteiza, 2015/01/30