|
| From: | Nick Andryshak |
| Subject: | Re: string> missing? |
| Date: | Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:11:11 -0400 |
> Because they do. The cause is lost in history. > No, I don't agree. > That's exactly the point: there's no need to apply the same logic to > both cases. Those are entirely unreasonable answers. - Nick
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |