|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: Upcoming loss of usability of Emacs source files and Emacs. |
Date: | Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:15:52 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
\` and \' already have a special meaning in docstring sources >(unrelated to this issue)I don't know which meaning you're referring to.
After looking into this I decided that \` and \' are typically mistakes.I had thought that they may have sometimes have been inserted to avoid highlighting when viewing the sources. For example, a source docstring like "...\`foo\'..." acts like "...`foo'..." except that when one is viewing the source the "foo" is not highlighted (and of course one sees the otherwise-unnecessary backslashes). However, highlighting occurs anyway when the docstring is copied into a *Help* buffer, which means that in some sense it's misleading to try to suppress the source highlighting.
There appears to be no rhyme or reason to the few instances of backslash-quotes in strings, some of which are obviously just typos, so I took the liberty of eliding them in master commit 3213d7707026573ca425ba1c865b7fa1a8b46639.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |