[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "concurrency" branch updated
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: "concurrency" branch updated |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Nov 2015 19:09:52 +0200 |
> From: Ken Raeburn <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 01:19:38 -0500
>
> I’ve tried to get the concurrency branch updated with respect to master,
> including the handlerlist/catchlist merge and timerfd support. It seems to be
> working okay, passing the tests Tom checked it for it, and correctly running
> a few nice, simple tests that I tried. It also crashes on a not-so-nice,
> simple test I tried, but the old version did too. :-)
Thanks for working on this.
> I dropped the changelogs. (Arguably maybe I should’ve pulled out just the
> branch-specific items and kept them?)
There should be no need, the log messages will provide that
information when we merge the branch.
> I’ve tried to preserve the Windows-related changes, but not having a Windows
> box, I couldn’t test that part.
The Windows build was broken, I fixed it.
> I haven’t done anything about addressing issues brought up a couple years
> back when this work was discussed here, but I’ve been starting to go back
> over some of those emails to see what’s needed.
Thanks!
- "concurrency" branch updated, Ken Raeburn, 2015/11/01
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, John Wiegley, 2015/11/02
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/02
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/02
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, John Wiegley, 2015/11/02
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Elias Mårtenson, 2015/11/02
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Ken Raeburn, 2015/11/03
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/03
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/03
Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Ken Raeburn, 2015/11/03