[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "concurrency" branch updated
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: "concurrency" branch updated |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:58:52 +0200 |
> From: Tom Tromey <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:46:40 -0700
>
> One idea would be to make it so that each terminal runs in its own
> thread.
By "terminal" do you mean X display? If so, the w32 port already does
something like that: it reads system input messages, including
keyboard input and all the rest, in a separate thread, which feeds the
queue serviced by the read_socket hook.
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, (continued)
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Tom Tromey, 2015/11/05
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, John Wiegley, 2015/11/05
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/05
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/06
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Tom Tromey, 2015/11/05
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Tom Tromey, 2015/11/05
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: "concurrency" branch updated, Tom Tromey, 2015/11/06