Re: Dynamic loading progress

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: John Wiegley <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 16:52:53 -0500
> 
> >>>>> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > I've tried to review the discussion so far and believe the code is
> > "functional enough." I think we got agreement from Stefan (probably John
> > too) to exempt dynamic modules from the feature freeze.
> 
> If Eli and Stefan agree, you have my go ahead to integrate the code. If anyone
> else disagrees, please say so now.

I don't see any reasons to disagree.  But adding such a feature, IME,
needs more than just one week before we shake it up enough.