Re: message-function

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 13:31:21 +0000 Artur Malabarba <address@hidden> wrote: 

AM> 2015-11-06 19:03 GMT+00:00 Artur Malabarba <address@hidden>:
>> [...]

AM> Anyway. Though I feel quite strongly about this, it is a relatively
AM> small detail and not worth stalling the feature.
AM> So if you think it makes things more complicated, Ted, don't waste
AM> your energy on this.

No, please, your experience with recent Emacs changes makes you much
more reliable on these seemingly minor details.  Don't be afraid to take
the lead on this and implement it as you see fit.  My only goal is to
provide a simple, sensible interface that can be extended by packages.

Ted