[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA policy
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA policy |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Nov 2015 20:04:56 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> How about just using a single repository? ;-)
>
> Seriously, why should they be separate? Submodules still complicate
> things, compared to just having the stuff in the repo.
I'm not strongly against that. But there are a couple of things that
might be annoying with that:
- Elpa commits would occasionally flood the git log
- Git operations in both repositories would become even slower than they
are now (as they'd both increase in size).
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/06
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Yuri Khan, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/09